Papers with tool-augmented agents
MemoBrain: Executive Memory as an Agentic Brain for Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are inherently long-horizon, causing reasoning traces and tool artifacts to accumulate and strain the working context of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that constructs a dependency-aware memory over reasoning steps and captures salient intermediate states and their logical relations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model prunes invalid steps, folds completed sub-trajectories, and preserves a compact, high-salience reasoning backbone under a fixed context budget. |
Structured Uncertainty guided Clarification for LLM Agents (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to clarifying tasks fail when user instructions are ambiguous or incomplete. |
| Approach: | They propose a principled formulation of structured uncertainty that operates directly over tool parameters and their domains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves when2call accuracy and training-time sample efficiency. |
TEA-Bench: A Systematic Benchmarking of Tool-enhanced Emotional Support Dialogue Agent (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing ESC systems focus on affective support in text-only settings, ignoring how external tools can enable factual grounding and reduce hallucination in multi-turn emotional support. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating tool-augmented agents in ESC with realistic emotional scenarios and an MCP-style tool environment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that tool augmentation improves emotional support quality and reduces hallucination, but weaker models benefit only marginally. |